Writing Essay Topic - Which Are the Best Persuasive Essay Topics?

Writing Essay Topic - Which Are the Best Persuasive Essay Topics?When writing an essay, one of the most important things to consider is the topic. There are hundreds of persuasive essay topics, but which are the best?The topic must be the product of thought and work. It must be a product of research and analysis. And above all, it must make sense and be used in a manner that a reader can understand and use.A lot of people choose to have essay topics printed out and read or looked over. However, the best way to do this is to listen to the topic you are writing about. You don't have to go looking for the topic or at the internet, but I recommend doing some research on your topic and then trying to research what readers of your topic will find useful. It's a better way to improve your essay than just sending it off to some guy to write it up.My personal preference is to listen to the topic, get feedback and make a decision as to which topic you would like to write on. Doing this step, y ou'll have a much more powerful essay and you'll be surprised at how good it actually sounds!Writing an essay is hard. While it may sound easy, there are so many things to consider that it really takes a lot of time and effort to get through the piece without mistakes. That's why I find it important to let myself go and really listen to my topic and see what it is that I'm saying to others.If I come across a topic that I really enjoy, I will go ahead and write it. If not, I'll at least take a look at it until I find something that I really like. If you do this, you'll see that it really pays off when you decide to write the essay.Remember, the topics you choose will be used by others as well as you. Therefore, you want them to get something out of reading the essay and it should give you something to think about.

A Brief Note On Medicare And Social Security - 1334 Words

3) During the early stages of our adulthood, we often hear about Medicare and Social Security, but sometimes it doesn t resonate how important those factors play in our future. Since 1966, Medicare has been providing health insurance to both the old and young while taking money from those who are able to work and provide for themselves. Meanwhile, Social Security is in charge of giving money to those who are old, disabled, widowed, and have low income through taxing citizens. Both of these federal government run programs play a key role in redistributing wealth throughout the country. They are put in place to assure citizens, 65 and older, with disabilities, and fall under the bottom tier of the class system, are cared for and given†¦show more content†¦So the individuals being taxed may receive less than half of what they payed. Even now, the Medicare system put in place to provide healthcare to those in need does not provide full coverage for all healthcare costs. Liked a domino effect, hospitals and other healthcare providers are then forced to either take the loss or provide minimal health care. Since we have these issues on hand, there are some solutions that may benefit both those in need, health care providers as well as the Social Security and Medicare Systems financially. Recently, there have been many theories of financing health care providers and those in Social Security programs. One of which is to raise taxes on the upper class and use the net worth towards the medical field and those who provide health care to Medicare patients (Madjaroff, 2014). However, even though this seems like a logical idea, what are the chances of the upper class paying even more taxes for the health care providers? If we expect to increase taxes on the upper class, they may question why taxes aren’t raised for the middle and lower classes as well. If businessmen are taxed more, they are likely to reduce the income rates of working class men to reduce the deficit. So this solution may not be efficient and bring about the much needed change. Another solution is to increase the retirement ages from 65 to 70. Pushing the age requirement by five years, should decrease the number of eligible applicants of Medicare and Social

Organizational Culture and Structure - 1134 Words

Organizational Culture and Structure The structure of an organization determines the allocation of roles, regulations, and responsibilities, and therefore builds a basis for the culture in an organization. There is a constant relationship between organizational structure and organizational culture that provides a theme within an organization. Both can be difficult to clearly define and distinguish when analyzing an organization. Organization culture is a perspective into the company’s personality; it provides descriptive values, principals, traditions, and a way of doing things that effect how members view the organization (Robbins, DeCenzo, Coulter, 2013). The organizational structure builds the†¦show more content†¦Stories of innovation inspire creativity and help build the strength of an organization’s culture. A strong organizational culture holds key values that are shared with all members. It is the responsibility of leaders to uphold an organization’s culture to ensure that the re is a proper foundation that binds the structure. Organizational Structure Any organization should have its own operating structure in order to reach success. Organizational structure is defined as a hierarchy of people that determine roles of authority, communications, and the duties of an organization (Robbins et al., 2013). Organizations must organize their structure to meet the needs of that particular organization, and assure that it resembles the values instilled by the organizational culture. The development of culture through an organization is a natural process that is dependent upon the instilled values of the leaders and members in the organization (O’Neil, 2011). Leaders can still influence the culture by sticking to their values and implementing a strong and effective organizational structure. There are several models that organizations can utilize to structure the elements within the organization. The structure of an organization can be divided into two generic organization structure models. Below is a chart as presented by Robbins et al. (2013)Show MoreRelatedOrganizational Structure and Culture661 Words   |  3 PagesOrganizational Structure and Culture Introduction In this week’s assignment we will be looking at organizational structure and organizational culture. We will first look at how organizational culture impacts organizational structure and vice versa. Then look at how organizational structure interacts and impacts the organization’s decision process. Organizational Cultures Impact on Organizational Structure The first part of this week’s assignment was to look at how organizational structure impactsRead MoreOrganizational Structure and Culture1163 Words   |  5 PagesOrganizational structure can be defined as the establishment of authority and responsibilities between different positions in the company. It can be either horizontal or vertical. Organization structure also facilitates transparency in the organization (Luthans, 1998). My organization is Saint Joseph’s Hospital, which is a leading magnet facility here in Atlanta Georgia. Saint Joseph s was the first hospital in the Southeast to perform open heart surgery, the first to develop a cardiac cath labRead MoreOrganizational Culture and Structure965 Words   |  4 PagesORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE STRUCTURE Outline Prepared By: Marnela Kathleen V. Pasamba, RN MSN I I. Organizational Culture A. Definitions 1. Gareth Morgan: set of beliefs, values and norms, together with symbols like dramatized events and personalities, that represents the unique character of the organization and provides the context for action in it and by it. 2. Edgar Schein: a pattern of shared basic assumptions that the group has learned as it solved its problems that has worked wellRead MoreOrganizational Structure and Culture1802 Words   |  8 Pages Organizational Structure and Culture Marsha Ruckle Senior Practicum/492 May 13, 2013 Janice Cochran Organizational Structure and Culture Every facility has an authority structure within the organization that is the foundation for the oversight of delegating processes and expected outcomes. Without structure there is a potential for chaos to ensue, communication to be inhibited, thereby preventing goals from getting accomplished. Organizational structureRead MoreThe Organizational Structures And Culture2323 Words   |  10 Pages1.1Different organisational structures and culture Every business needs to organise its activities and a defined structure enables them do it well. For example, every area of the business knows what they are supposed to do and when to do it. In addition, they know who to report to with the aid of a good structure. On the other hand, organisational culture is something that is not tangible but can be observed in the way people do the things they do and in the way they treat one another and theirRead MoreThe Impact of Organizational Structure and Culture819 Words   |  3 PagesThe Impact of Organizational Structure and Culture Organizational structure has been set up to facilitate all goal achievements. It is a way to motivate their employees and get them to work together. It also helps its employees to follow the organizations goals, and work together as a team. In order to do this, they need to have an organized structure to be able to run the company smoothly. A main foundation of every organization is to post their mission statement and goals everywhere so that theirRead MoreOrganizational Structure and Culture Essay1111 Words   |  5 Pagesthe basics of understanding the very design, structure, and culture that are appropriate in fulfilling the goals of that organization. Experts say that organizational structure and culture should work in tandem - as a team within the organization. It is important for organizations to â€Å"understand the difference between the two aspects because they can have a major influence on the firm’s success or failure.† John (2013). Organizational culture comes from the founders of the organization andRead MoreBoeing: Organizational Culture and Structure1493 Words   |  6 PagesORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND STRUCTURE 2 Boeing: Organizational Culture and Structure Jory Authement MGMT312 Management Theory and Practices Professor Stephen Stewart April 22, 2014 Before we can begin a discussion on the cultural dynamics within the Boeing Company, it is imperative that we define and briefly elaborate about the foundational structures of the company, and its core values. Both of which has a direct impact in the development of its culture.. Being that Boeing has remote multinationalRead MoreOrganizational Culture, Structure Design2121 Words   |  9 PagesRunning head: ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, STRUCTURE DESIGN 1 Organizational Culture, Structure Design Satish kumar Gummalla University Canada West Instructor: Liz Wiebe Business Fundamentals MBA 549, Section B March 17, 2011 Satish Kumar Gummalla (1010863) Page 1 of 9 ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE, STRUCTURE DESIGN Abstract Organizational structure defines the attitude, values and core competencies of an organization. The structure in a way forms the culture for that organization whichRead MoreOrganizational Culture : Organization Structure Essay2391 Words   |  10 Pagesbe in-line with the organizational objective. Defining and identifying an organization structure affects the organization in two big ways – it provides the foundation on which standard operating procedures and routines rest and it determines which individuals get to participate in which decision making process. For the ease of operations, the organization structure is further divided into: Tall organization structure – for large complex companies Flat organization structure – mid-size organisations

Understanding the Gothic novel can be accomplished by obtaining a familiarity of the Augustan point of view Essay Example For Students

Understanding the Gothic novel can be accomplished by obtaining a familiarity of the Augustan point of view Essay Understanding the Gothic novel can be accomplished by obtaining a familiarity of the Augustan point of view, which helps to develop a reference point for comparing and contrasting the origin of Gothic literature. The thinking that was being questioned by the Gothic novel was Augustanism; and without some understanding of Augustan principles and their role in eighteenth-century thought it is difficult to understand the purposes of the Gothic revival, either in terms of history or in terms of the way in which it offered a new conception of the relations between man, nature and a supreme being. David punter describes the political relationship of the Augustan thinker to the literary world, It is tempting to see in Augustanism the doctrine of a small cultural elite holding on to power and status under increasing pressure, and that pressure as precisely that exerted by the new reading public on the homogeneity of the old literary establishment p 31 Punter. This small number of elite would have included, but not limited to, Fielding, Johnson and especially Pope. However, Fielding and Johnson were slowly stepping outside of the realm of the Augustan limitations. Fielding was undoubtedly Augustan in his beliefs in the stability of social rules and the necessity of a social and psychological compromise, but his mocking attitude towards literary stipulation represents a more moderate Augustan replication. Johnson, on the other hand, was a firm believer in these literary rules and yet it was his Preface to Shakespeare which became the first significant breach in these limitations. Alexander Popes Essay on Man embodies the cosmological, theological and ethical beliefs of the Augustan age; while at the same time exemplifying submission to the rules of literary form. The Augustan approach was intellectual with formal restraint; while relying on reason and traditionalism to create literary works. These stipulations were very controlled by their boundaries and could not be exaggerated with out being broken. The Augustan critical attitude condemned spontaneity for its chaotic qualities, imagination for its objection to reason and liberalism for its opposition to traditionalism. Gothic fiction appears as a specific response to the Age of Reasons order. During the late eighteenth-century, several different kinds of new fiction arose to challenge the Augustan tradition; leading the way was the Gothic novel. An interest in those things, which cannot be understood, for example religion and the soul, results in an overwhelming expansion of what is accepted as art in the literary world. No longer is literature responsible for explanation, but it now has the power to question. Where the classical was obsessed with order, the gothic exemplified chaos; where simple and pure, Gothic was ornate and lustful; where tradition was expected to be followed, the Gothic represented boundless exaggeration; and where reason was respected, imagination took hold. With the evolution of the Gothic novel, for the first time literature was perceived as limitless. In a literary context Gothic is most usually applied to a group of novels written between 1760 and 1820. Characteristics of the Gothic novel are: an emphasis on portraying the terrifying, insistence on archaic settings, a very prominent use of supernatural forces, the presence of highly stereotypical characters and an attempt to perfect the technique of literary suspense. Angela Carter most accurately defines Gothic, in her collection of tales Fireworks: The Gothic tradition grandly ignores the value systems of our institutions, it deals entirely with the profane. Its great themes are incest and cannibalism. Character and events are exaggerated beyond reality to become symbols, ideas and passions. Its style will tend to be ornate, unnatural and thus operate against the perennial human desire to believe the word as fact. Its only humor is black humor. It retains a singular moral function à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" that of provoking unease p 4 Carter. This description identifies all the defining characteristics of Mathew Lewis The Monk and educates the reader as to what to expect. .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .postImageUrl , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:hover , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:visited , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:active { border:0!important; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:active , .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ued3537c3e46c4df57d13ff26c81feb5e:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Arthur Miller And Crucible EssayUnlike traditional literature of predecessors like Fielding, Johnson and Pope, Lewis The Monk embodies one of the first steps into the realm of the Gothic novel; presented as a rebellion against the traditional norms. The chilling paradox of the novel is found in Lewis mixing of a rationalistic secular skepticism and insistent employment of the least rationalistic supernatural element: Satan. God does not truly exist but the devil does p63 Greary. Lewis evokes the horror of horrors, a malign cosmos where the devil, not God, is the only authoritative power presented. Robert Geary acknowledges Lewis use of religion as a basis for skepticism in his novel. Instead of focusing on the conventional wrath of God, Lewis implores a wrath of a demonic supernatural force. The basis for this creation lies within a mistrust of the Roman Catholic Church. The Gothic fantasy was not a call for revolt, but a revolution from the values and attitudes of everyday life. In creating a monk who rapes, kills, and sells his soul to the devil, Lewis is enlightening the reader to the moral depravity which man is capable of when he becomes obsessive. This psychological aspect of the novel appeals to the readers mind and self. The differentiation between the mind and self was a relevant topic during the late eighteenth-century. While Ambrosio has all the qualities of a monk, Lewis draws attention to the unnaturalness of his rearing through the church. All that a monk is expected to avoid, is constantly enveloping Ambrosios mind. Lewis illustrates, exceptionally well, the devils control over an individual most unlikely to succumb. Without the psychological analysis, which is available today, Lewis attempts to offer symbolic suggestions as to the cause of the irrationality of his characters. For example, Ambrosias condition is blamed on fault in his background, for he was brought up by monks who terrified his young mind, by placing before him all the horror with which superstition could furnish them P188 Lewis. As evident here, the Gothic novel evoked a new perception of viewing what was considered normalcy, in a way that was for so long buried beneath the rationalism of the Age. The Monk became the authoritative model for the high Gothic novel of unmitigated hideousness and extravagant supernaturalism p7 Barron. Lewis offers the reader a continuing extravaganza of horrid shock while subjecting both his good and evil characters to the powers of the devil. Throughout the novel, the Catholic Church is seen as a thorn in a side of the characters , which allows them to become claustrophobic instruments of isolation and reinforce the errors of social communication, which have been a longstanding convention of the eighteenth-century life. According to Barrons Horror Literature, this depiction of the church as a threat meets the first criteria for a Gothic novel in that Gothic characters must feel enclosed by menacing buildings and by other circumstances of enclosure within the Gothic structureà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Claustrophobic confinement is the psychic imperative of all Gothic fiction p8 Barron. Lewis was interested in the particular vicissitudes of the psyche and he made use of social phenomenon and setting to reinforce this depiction. Lewis took the stipulations set before him by the Augustan thinkers of the eighteenth-century and created a novel by representing everything these thinkers opposed; ultimately creating a whole new genre of literary fiction. Fielding and Johnson helped to lay the framework for Lewis by bending the limitations placed on literature. The creation of the Gothic novel can be contributed to Lewis The Monk; he set the standard for which authors still today use for reference in their own Gothic novels. Mathew Lewis is the father of the Gothic revival.