The Wall in Robert Frosts Mending Wall As A Symbol of Division Essay Example for Free

The Wall in Robert Frosts fixing Wall As A Symbol of Division EssayThe ordinarily mundane takes a perspective arousing spin in one of Robert Frosts earlier works, Mending Wall. This poetry is a striking take on an otherwise commonplace ritual between two farmers in the spring. Because the poem is in blank verse, it carries a casual folksy feel throughout, contradictory to its deeper message and paradoxical tone. legal fences make good neighbors. This line is a paradox when comp bed with the previous statement, Something thither is that doesnt love a wall. Fences equate to walls, and what are walls but provisional boundaries?The boundary in this story is a fence make of stone that separates the properties of two neighboring farmers. This wall is the focal point of the poem, the subject that brings to attention the divide between individuals. The loudspeaker system one day finds the wall broken from what appears to be the after effects of winter. He calls his neighbor to me et with him to fix the wall and does so annually. The wall is ironic in that although it separates the two individuals, it brings them together erstwhile a year.The two live united, but separated. The wall is a metaphor for the separation between the speaker and the neighbor and perhaps even a greater analogy for the division of people as a society. These divisions could include a division of thought, which we see is unalike for the two characters. The speaker believes that the wall is unnecessary when he asks his neighbor, Why do they make good fences? Isnt it where there are cows? But here there are no cows. His neighbor replies with the same old adage he stated before.It is patent that the neighbor and speaker are of differing opinions and backgrounds. We might even assume that the neighbor and speaker are of different ages, meaning there may be a generational gap between the two that creates this contrast of opinion. Something there is, that doesnt love a wall That sends th e frozen ground swell underneath it. A reversal of syntax in the first line paints the narrative in a decidedly suspicious manor and leaves it up to the reader to interpret what something could be.We find out later that that something likely is character, or the indispensable forces of winter. The wall is portrayed as an un innate thing, something that is not a part of nature, something that does not fit in with the innate environment. This notion is supported when he later states, To each the boulders have twilighten to each. And some are loaves and some are so nearly balls we have to use a spell to make them quietus. Frost suggests that there is a natural force tearing down the walls because the walls are not natural.The storyteller stresses that the rocks that make up the wall fit together so unnaturally and so imperfectly that they inquire a spell to help them balance. Spells are unnatural and are magical, so it is as if the wall is held up by spells. We can garner from t he text that this particular wall has many forces out to destroy it(eg. natural tolls, animals, hunters, etc. ) and its destruction is an annual occurrence. Even its reoccurring destruction implies its unnaturalness and that nature does not agree with it.Perhaps nature itself is intent on destroying the wall, as it is an unnatural extension of man and all unnatural extensions of man(eg. skyscrapers, buildings, cities) are meant to fall down to nature at some point. The paradox again is that the wall is made of stone, or natural elements, and this wall is destroyed each year. Perhaps the destruction is a reflection of the speakers disposition to break down the physical and imaginary boundary between the two neighbors that the wall represents.